User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; En-US; L-07C Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, Like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.7.0.315 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGL-07C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.3GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.3LGOptimus Bright L-07Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0closeAndroid 2.3.3LGL-07Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.315WebKit 528.5Android 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.3LGOptimus bright L-07Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:47 | by ThaDafinser