User agent detail

Android/3.2.0.2 samsung/GT-I9195 4.2.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9195 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android 3.2.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 3.2.0.2SamsungGalaxy S4 Minimobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.2SamsungGALAXY S4 minismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 3.2.0SamsungGT-I9195closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 3.2.0SamsungGalaxy S4 Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.066 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.128 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:46 | by ThaDafinser