User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; U; Nokia808 PureView; xx) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) NokiaWebview/1.0 Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 5.2Webkit 534.3Nokia808 PureViewmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian^3 Nokia808smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 534.3closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 808closeSymbian^3 Nokia808closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 534.3NokiaOS NokiaNokia 808closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.3Series60 5.2Nokia808 PureViewmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:46 | by ThaDafinser