User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; IRIS 455 Build/LAVAIRIS455) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 455 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1LavaIris 455mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.1LavaIris 455smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.1LavaIris 455closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 455closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.1LavaIris 455mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.1LavaIris 455Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:44 | by ThaDafinser