User agent detail

NOKIA-1681C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia1681C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NOKIA-1681C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Nokia1681Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaN1681Csmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia1681Ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia1681Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:44 | by ThaDafinser