User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT; U; xx) AppleWebKit/522+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Iris/1.0.14 Safari/419.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-iris.yaml
Iris 1.0.14Windows Mobile Webkit 522mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 419.3closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows NTdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iris 1.0.14closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 1.0.14closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.20202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iris Browser 1.0.14WebKit 522Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iris 1.0.14Webkit 522Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:44 | by ThaDafinser