User agent detail

MQQBrowser/2.0 (Nokia6120cAP20.01;SymbianOS/9.1 Series60/3.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6120cAP20 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 2.0closeSymbian OS 9.1Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 2.0 Symbian OS Series 60 3.0Nokia6120cAP20smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 9.1closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 2.0closeSymbian OS 9.1Nokia6120cAP20closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.0closeSymbianOS 9.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 2.0 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6120cAP20closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 2.0 Series60 3.0Nokia6120 classicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:43 | by ThaDafinser