User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; Novo7_ELF Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.65583
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AinolNovo7_ELF Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.65583closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.33603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.0AinolSGH-ZV40tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.0.3AinolNovo7_ELFcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.29203 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.65583WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.0.3AinovoNovo7 Elftabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.65583closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:43 | by ThaDafinser