User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; en-US; WEXLER-TAB-7T Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.9.6.495 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
UC Browser 9.9Android 4.1unknown WexlerTAB 7TTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.9U3 Android 4.1WexlerTAB 7TTabletyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1WexlerTAB 7Tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.9WebKit Android 4.1WexlerTAB-7Ttabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.9.6closeAndroid 4.1.1WEXLER-TAB-7Tcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.9.6.495WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.9Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1WexlerTab 7Ttabletyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:43 | by ThaDafinser