User agent detail

iTunes/11.3.1 (Windows; Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Home Premium Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 7601)) AppleWebKit/537.60.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-424.php
iTunes 11.3Win32 unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iTunes 11.3WebKit Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.60.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
iTunes 11.3.1closeWindows 7media-playercloseclose0.20902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iTunes 11.3 Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iTunes 11.3.1closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
iTunes 11.3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iTunes 11.3.1WebKit 537.60.17Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iTunes 11.3.1Webkit 537.60.17Windows desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:43 | by ThaDafinser