User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; ru; W200 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/9.5.1.494 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.5Android 4.2unknown ThLW200Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.2ThLW200Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.1ThLW200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 4.2.1ThlW200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.494WebKit 528.5Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 528.5Android 4.2.1Cherry MobileW200mobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:42 | by ThaDafinser