User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (;;;) AppleWebKit/534.6 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; inverto; IDL-6651N Volksbox Web Edition; 1.0; 1.0;) hdplusinteraktiv/1.0 (NETRANGEMMH;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Webkit 534.6InvertoIDL-6651N Volksbox Web Editiontv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.073 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
InvertoIDL-6651N Volksbox Web Editiontv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close invertoIDL-6651N Volksbox Web Editioncloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.6 InvertoIDL 6651N Volksbox Web Editiontelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:42 | by ThaDafinser