User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; en-US; Mi280 Build/FRG83G) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.7.0.315 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SpiceMi280 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7WebKit Android 2.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0closeAndroid 2.2.2SpiceMi280closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.315WebKit 528.5Android 2.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Webkit 528.5Android 2.2.2Mi280mobile:smartyescloseclose0.084 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:42 | by ThaDafinser