User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.5.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-297.php
Firefox 3.5MacOSX 10.61.9.1 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.13closeOS X 10.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Mac 10.6desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.13closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.13closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.13closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.09201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.13Gecko 20100914Mac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.13Gecko 1.9.1Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.13closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:42 | by ThaDafinser