User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5230W/S523WXEIL1 SHP/VPP/R5 Jasmine/1.0 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Jasmine 1.0 SamsungGT-S5230Wsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Jasmine 1.0NetFront JAVA SamsungGT-S5230Mobile Phoneyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5230W S523WXEIL1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungGT S5230Wmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Jasmine 1.0 SamsungGT-S5230Wsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungGT-S5230Wcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Jasmine 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.0 Touchwiz 2.0 or earlierSamsungStarmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT S5230WFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:41 | by ThaDafinser