User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/3.6;FBBV/330148;FBDM/{density=0.75,width=240,height=320};FBLC/de_DE;FBCR/o2 - de;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/GT-S5570;FBSV/2.2.1;FBCA/armeabi:unknown;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-767.php
Facebook App 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 3.6 O2iPhone 6smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 3.6close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SamsungGalaxy Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook closeclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:41 | by ThaDafinser