User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; XML Sitemaps Generator; http://www.xml-sitemaps.com) Gecko XML-Sitemaps/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesXML Sitemaps GeneratorBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesXML Sitemaps GeneratorBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesXML Sitemaps Generator/1.0close0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0Gecko closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko closeclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:41 | by ThaDafinser