User agent detail

IRLbot/3.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; http://irl.cs.tamu.edu/crawler)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
IRLbot 3.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesResearch ProjectsBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesIRLbot/3.0close0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesIRLbotclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesIRLbotCrawler0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:41 | by ThaDafinser