User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.1; xx; SAMSUNG GT-I8805) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.1.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser Tizen 2.1Webkit 537.1Samsung"Redwood"mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 2.1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen 2.1SamsungGT-I8805smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux SamsungGT-I8805closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 537.1Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.1Samsung"Redwood"mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:41 | by ThaDafinser