User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A5376e Safari/8536.25 (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-077.php
yesGoogle Bot MobileBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Bot MobileBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebot-Mobileclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 6.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot Mobile 2.1WebKit 536.26 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebot Mobileclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebot Mobileclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:40 | by ThaDafinser