User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/538.14 (KHTML, like Gecko) BingPreview/1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesBing Preview Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler0.095 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBing Previewclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingPreview 1.0bWebKit 538.14Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:40 | by ThaDafinser