User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/7E18 Grindr/1.8.5 (iPhone1,2/4.2.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPhone1,2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 528.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS AppleiPhone 3Gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPhone1,2closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 528.18iOS AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 528.18iOS AppleiPhone 3Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.0.5closeiOS 4.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:40 | by ThaDafinser