User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.154 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1387.82
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Opera 20.0.1387.82Mac OSX 10.9.2 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 20.0Blink MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1387.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 20.0.1387.82closeOS X 10.9.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 20.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1387.82closeOS X 10.9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1387closeMac OS X 10.9.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.154closeOS X 10.9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1387.82WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 20.0Blink OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1387.82closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeMac OS X 1091Desktopcloseclose0.077 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:38 | by ThaDafinser