User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; F10X Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.60140
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 15.0Android 4.1unknown NextwayF10XTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.1NextwayF10XTabletyesyes0.112 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.1.1F10Xcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.60140WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1.1F10Xtabletyescloseclose0.084 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:37 | by ThaDafinser