User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/45.0.2454.7 Chrome/45.0.2454.7 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 45.0.2454.7Ubuntu Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 45.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 45.0.2454.7closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 45.0Blink Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 45.0.2454closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 45.0.2454.7WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 45.0.2454.7Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:37 | by ThaDafinser