User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320; HTC_P3650)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP3650 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows CE HTCP3650smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows CE HTCP3650closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile HTCTouch Cruisemobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch Cruise/P3650Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:37 | by ThaDafinser