User agent detail

LIAuthLibrary:0.0.2 com.linkedin.android:3.4.2 TCL_ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 4037T:android_4.4.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesLinkedInBotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesLinkedInBotBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LIAuthLibrary closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android AlcatelGALAXY Tab 3 8.0"smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
TCLONE TOUCH 4037T:android 4.4.2closeclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:37 | by ThaDafinser