User agent detail

Reader Notifier/5 CFNetwork/596.3.3 Darwin/12.3.0 (x86_64) (MacBookPro7,1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X 10.8.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Reader closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeOS X 10.8.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 596.3.3closeMac OS X 10.8.3AppleMacBookPro7,1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OS X Mountain Lion 10.8.3desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:36 | by ThaDafinser