User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-CN; Lenovoa800 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.8.3.292 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Lenovoa800 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.069 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 8.8.3.292closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 4.2LenovoPre 1.2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.3closeAndroid 4.2.2Lenovoa800closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.3.292WebKit 534.31Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.4LenovoA800mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:36 | by ThaDafinser