User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 5020D Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOne Touch 5020D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1AlcatelOne Touch 5020Dsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1closeAndroid 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch 5020Dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 18.0.1Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch M'Popmobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.1AlcatelOT-5020DSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:36 | by ThaDafinser