User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/44.5.7.269 Chrome/44.0.2403.125 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Dragon 44.5Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 44.5Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.125WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 44.5Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:36 | by ThaDafinser