User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; LGL86C Build/IMM76L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650.59Android 4.0.4Blink LGL86Csmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.058 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.0.4LGL86Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 31.0Blink Android 4.0LGL86Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.0.4LGLGL86Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.0.4LGOptimus Showtimemobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0LGL86CSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:35 | by ThaDafinser