User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone3,1; iPhone; U; CPU OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X; en_US) com.google.GooglePlus/29676 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/N90AP (gzip)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-138.php
Google+ App 0.0iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Google+ App WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.099 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Google Plus iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 4smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.0.4closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0.4closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPhone3,1closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeiPhone OS 7.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google+ iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhone 4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:35 | by ThaDafinser