User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; ST97216-1 Build/ST97216-1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TrekstorST97216-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.088 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.31303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.0tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.0.4TrekstorST97216-1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.21402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.0.4TrekstorSurftab Ventos 9.7tabletyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:35 | by ThaDafinser