User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; lg-c395) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/83/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGc395 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.093 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5WebKit LGc395smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close LGc395closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.5.0.185WebKit 530.13 LGLGc395closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.5Gecko LGc395mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:35 | by ThaDafinser