User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Opera) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.377 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-mre.yaml
UC Browser 9.4 Gecko mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera U2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.377 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.037 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close HTCMDA Vario VFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:34 | by ThaDafinser