User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; A50 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.117 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1396.72047
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MicromaxA50 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.111 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1396.72047closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 20.0.1396.72047closeAndroid 4.1.1QmobileNoir A50mobile-browseryescloseclose0.34003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1396.72047closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 20.0.1396closeAndroid 4.1.1MicromaxA50closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1396.72047WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.1.1A50mobile:smartyescloseclose0.085 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1396.72047closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20closeAndroid 4.1QmobileNoir A50Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:33 | by ThaDafinser