User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-gb) AppleWebKit/418.9.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) SiteCon/8.10.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesSiteConBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSiteConBot/Crawler0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 418.9.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SiteCon 8.10.22closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.0.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 418.9.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 418.9.1Linux closeclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:33 | by ThaDafinser