User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp China; http://misc.yahoo.com.cn/help.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesYahoo! Slurp Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesYahoo! Slurp ChinaBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesYahoo! Slurp Chinaclose0.23502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesYahoo! SlurpSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurp ChinaCrawler0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yahoo! Slurp Web Crawler Bot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesYahoo! Slurpclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesYahoo! Slurpclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:33 | by ThaDafinser