User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; NTT 611 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.1unknown NTT SystemNTT 611 10.1Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.1NTT SystemNTT 611 10.1Tabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.29003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.1.1NTT 611closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.1.1NTT 611tabletyescloseclose0.079 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.094 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:32 | by ThaDafinser