User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
IE 5.5WinNT unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Trident WinNT Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows NTdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.5closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.5 Windows desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 5.5closeWindows 2000Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:31 | by ThaDafinser