User agent detail

Mozilla/4.78 [ja] (Win98; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
UNKNOWN Windows 98 98 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.7Gecko Win98 98Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.7.8closeWindows 4.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.78close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.78 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.7.8 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:30 | by ThaDafinser