User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (en-us) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Web Preview) Version/3.1 Safari/525.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesGoogle Web Preview Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogleBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGoogle Web Previewclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 3.1close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 3.1WebKit 525.13 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Web Previewclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Web Previewclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:30 | by ThaDafinser