User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A536 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.111 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoA536Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA536Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA536mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA536smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA536closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.111WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoA536mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA536Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.09 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:30 | by ThaDafinser