User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; LG-GS390) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGS390 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close LGGS390mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGGS390smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGGS390closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.326 LGLGGS390closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Gecko LGGS390mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGGS390Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:29 | by ThaDafinser