User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/537.42+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/25.0.1349.2 Chrome/25.0.1349.2 Safari/537.42+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 25.0.1349.2Linux Webkit 537.42desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 25.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 25.0.1349.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 25.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 25.0.1349closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.13101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 25.0.1349.2WebKit 537.42Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 25.0.1349.2Webkit 537.42Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:28 | by ThaDafinser