User agent detail

Nokia3720classic/2.0 (cor6.53SSC) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia3720classic Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia3720classicsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia3720classiccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 3720classiccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420 Nokia3720classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:28 | by ThaDafinser