User agent detail

Tristit Push System;htc;endeavoru;HTC;HTC One X;o2_de;unknown;JDQ39;4.2.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne X Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Tristit closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCOne Xmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCOne Xsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCOne Xcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC One Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCOne Xmobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:28 | by ThaDafinser