User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; chromeframe; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows Vista Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Frame WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:27 | by ThaDafinser