User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; MID Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 YaBrowser/15.2.2214.3726.01 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 15.2Android 4.1unknown unknownMIDMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.1MIDMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 15.2.2214.3726.01closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.1yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 15.2.2214.3726.01closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214closeAndroid 4.1.2MIDcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.18002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214.3726.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2China MID Tabletcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.1.2MIDtabletyescloseclose0.077 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 4.1GinovoMIDTabletyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:27 | by ThaDafinser